On my courses students learn how to grind a primary bevel using both a dry grinder and a wet stone grinder. For the wet stone we use a Tormek which is a very good tool. For dry grinding we use a rather old and decrepid double ended grinder. A couple of weeks ago I decided to up grade this to a Creusen HP7200T. I liked this model as the wheels have a wider diameter 200mm as opposed to the more common 150mm. I believe the geometry of the extra diameter gives a stronger edge. Also Creusen have a reputation as a good quality tool. However I was very disappointed by the woefully inadequate tool rest. It was flimsy, difficult to adjust and the retaining screws seemed to interfere with the line of the edge when sharpening wide plane blades. I believe this is a common problem with many modern grinders, but I expected more from Creusen. After fiddling with the Creusen rest sfor a while I decided to ditch them and make my own more robust rest.
It was quite tricky to work out the geometry of the rest, the grinding angle is affected by two factors, the angle at which the tool is held and the position it is held on the wheel, moving the tool higher on the wheel will reduce the grinding angle. Although the rest is adjustable I needed to know approximately the required angle and height of the rest. I worked this out by trial and error, holding a chisel I knew was ground at the correct angle (25 degrees) against the wheel so the bevel rested on it’s circumference. The position of the chisel and wheel were recorded against a board offered up to the wheel. The geometry of the tool rest could then be picked from the board.
The rest design has two brass bearer plates that the tool rests on. The back plate is adjustable, being raised or lowered to change the grinding angle. The core of the rest is laminated from four layers of birch ply, the wider sides being glued to the sides of the core to form a recess for the adjusting assembly to run in. The adjustment is fixed by tightening the retaining machine screw, the screw runs in a threaded insert fitted to the core piece.As with all jigs, which is what the tool rest is, accuracy and precision are vital. If the rest is not square the ground edge will not be square, so each cut was checked for squareness as work progressed.
When finished the rest was screwed to the grinder base board positioned as indicated by the original trial and error recording, being careful to get it square with the wheel
I have to admit that I am always a little surprised when my jigs work first time! I was very happy with the edge produced using the rest. Looking at the design I realised that I could add a fence which would help students to grind a square edge. The recess between the two brass bearers could accomodate a sliding plate with a 90 degree fence. This was made using 3mm perspex sheet. The plate is retained by a screw that runs in a countersink groove, this ensures the plate runs true between the bearers.
If I make a second rest, which I probably will do for the other wheel, I think I will reduce the dimension front to back as the current dessign may not work for short chisels that have been reground many times.
If you would like to make the rest you can download a sketchup drawing of mine here:
However your rest design may require adjustment to allow for the different configuration of your grinder eg diameter and height of wheel. All the elements of the design are components so you can use the hide command to see hidden parts. I have not drawn in the various screws (my patience with sketchup does not extend to that!), but I have indicated the position of the holes.
If you have a go at making it but run into problems feel free to contact me.
If you like what you've read or know someone who would,
please help me spread the word by using the buttons below